Every Website Builder Should Have a Proper Semantic Section Element (But Most Don’t)

The section element in HTML is one of web design’s most fundamental and mission-critical elements. It groups content by topic, helps establish a gutter, helps establish a vertical spacing rhythm, and helps establish and maintain the content width of a website.

The big question is: why is such a fundamental, essential, and often-used element missing or improperly structured in most website builders?

Now, to be fair, there’s no such thing as a “section element” in HTML land. Basically, everything is a box in HTML. If you change the tag on a box, you can change its meaning and purpose.

But website builders are not “HTML land.” Website builders exist to help make our lives easier and our workflow faster (we hope).

Let’s discuss the desirable section structure and why every page builder should have a dedicated Section element.

Desirable section structure

Proper section element structure

When I talk about a “section element,” it’s really two elements in one. This is because, in HTML, you’ll typically see a section created like this:

  <div class="container">
Code language: HTML, XML (xml)

The section tag denotes the section, but in order to do anything relevant with it, you need an inner container for the actual content.

Here are some more specifics on this setup:

  • The inner container should be centered on the inline axis.
  • The inner container should default to the website’s content width.
  • The inner container should be selectable in the website builder.
  • A section should be able to have more than one inner container for grouping associated content.
  • Block padding should be used on the section to establish a vertical spacing rhythm for the content.
  • A consistent gutter for the website should be established using inline padding on the section. Alternatively, a min() function can be used on the container to establish a gutter.

What appears to be a relatively simple section setup is more complex under the hood. But the why behind all this is essential:

  1. Sections group page content semantically
  2. Containers within sections group associated content for easier spacing, patterning, and maneuverability.
  3. Containers establish a consistent content width.
  4. Sections establish a consistent gutter.
  5. Consistent padding values in sections establish a vertical spacing rhythm.

Here’s a Codepen version:

See the Pen Desirable Section Structure by Kevin Geary (@geary-co) on CodePen.

Why website builders should have a single drag-and-drop element that does all this automatically

In WordPress’ block editor, which has no section element, here are the steps required to reproduce the desirable section structure:

  1. Add a Group element to the canvas (2 clicks).
  2. Change the Group element’s semantic tag to section (3 clicks)
  3. Add another Group element inside the original one (3 clicks)
  4. Add a .container class to the inner Group element (2 clicks)

In order for this to work, you have to write global CSS to add styling instructions:

section {
	display: flex;
	flex-direction: column;

:where(main > section) {
  padding-block: var(--section-space);
  padding-inline: var(--gutter);
  gap: var(--container-gap);

.container {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  margin-inline: auto;
  width: 100%;
  max-width: var(--content-width);
Code language: CSS (css)

See! When using a website builder that doesn’t have the foresight to create a section element with sensible defaults, the user has to write global CSS and then spend 10 clicks *per section* to lay their page out.

Now, let’s contrast the WordPress Block Editor experience with the experience a user will have in a capable website builder like Bricks Builder:

  1. Add a Section element to the canvas (2 clicks)
  2. Move on with life

Default section styling can be applied in Bricks’ global theme styles without writing a single line of CSS.

So, not only does the user not have to write CSS, but adding a section to the page only costs two clicks. If a page has five sections, that’s ten total clicks (it’s actually only six because you don’t have to click the “add element” icon every time).

In WordPress’ Block Editor, Adding five Sections to a page costs 50 clicks. This is the type of inefficiency that should make any proper front-end developer want to jump off a bridge face first.

Isn’t this the exact scenario where we expect a website builder to step in and save us from all this hassle?

Not to mention, having a section element that does all this automatically ensures that semantic accuracy is applied more consistently across websites. When the user has to manually change the semantic tag on every generic “group” element or wrapper, there’s a much higher chance that they’ll forget a few here and there (or just never do it).

This is why you see so many Elementor sites without proper section tags. The user *can* manually set a section tag on a container acting as a section, but most don’t know they’re supposed to. It creates a fundamental semantic failure, not to mention all the other issues with spacing that arise from using generic containers.

Which popular website builders are failing users when it comes to providing a semantic Section element?

The answer is, “way too many!”

Popular website builders with *no* Section element

The following website builders don’t offer a drag-and-drop section element of any kind.

  • Elementorsection tag must be set manually on a generic container, and inner wrappers aren’t selectable.
  • Divi – No section element and no ability to set the tag manually.
  • WordPress (Gutenberg / Block Editor) – the section tag must be set manually on a generic container, and the inner wrapper must be added manually.
  • Generate Blocks – the section tag must be set manually.
  • Beaver Builder – the section tag must be set manually, and inner wrappers aren’t selectable.
  • Duda – the section tag must be set manually (a plan with “dev mode” is required), and inner wrappers aren’t selectable.
  • Webflow – Has a section element but doesn’t provide an inner container.

Website builders with a poorly structured Section element

The following website builders offer a drag-and-drop section element, but it has one or more vulnerabilities.

  • Wix – Has a section element, but doesn’t give the user access to the inner container. Also uses far too many nested wrappers.
  • Squarespace – Has a section element, but doesn’t provide the user access to the inner container. Also uses far too many nested wrappers.
  • Oxygen – Has a section element but doesn’t give the user access to the inner container.
  • Breakdance – Has a section element but doesn’t give the user access to the inner container.
  • Kadence Blocks – Has a section element but doesn’t give the user access to the inner container and fails to set the semantic tag automatically.
  • Cornerstone – Has a section element but doesn’t provide an inner container as part of it and doesn’t automatically set the semantic HTML tag. Useless.

Note: Not providing access to inner wrappers is a much bigger problem than most people think. It causes “deal breaker” type issues with styling, framework compatibility, CSS targeting, etc.

Website builders with a correct Section element

The following website builders have a proper drag-and-drop section element.

How can website builders improve?

A proper Section element isn’t just a “nice to have” feature. For me, it’s mandatory. I refuse to use a website builder that lacks a Section element or has a poorly structured Section element. I’ve spent enough time with those builders, and they’re not worth the hassle.

If you’re using one of the many website builders that fail in this regard and you want them to make improvements, feel free to send them this article. Developers will only make improvements in this area when users demand it.

join the conversation


  • I’d suggest taking another look at the WCAG usage notes for section. It may not be as one-size-fits-all as you think.

    1. Sections need headings to contribute meaning to the outline
    2. Not everything on the page should be within a semantic element
    3. You don’t need the inner div to get centered content. CSS grid FTW.

    Firstly for a section element to have any semantic meaning it needs to be accompanied by a heading or an aria-label. See WCAG notes: “The theme of each section should be identified, typically by including a heading as a descendant of the section element”. If there’s no label built into your section concept, then it isn’t actually conveying any more meaning to the document outline than a div.

    In terms of semantic meaning there are several elements included in the “Sectioning Elements” group of the HTML spec (Article, Aside, Nav, Header, Footer, Main), most of which offer more specific meaning and may be better suited to the content of the section than a tag. In the case of the WordPress block editor, its very likely that a blog post is going to be wrapped by an tag by the theme, which would be the appropriate container for long-form content. If that article doesn’t have chapters, sub-sections may not be appropriate.

    Also rarely is every piece of content on a page an essential part of the document’s outline. Many elements are purely decorative and are advised to be specifically excluded from semantic content. WCAG usage notes:
    “The section element is appropriate only if the element’s contents would be listed explicitly in the document’s outline. When an element is needed only for styling purposes or as a convenience for scripting, authors are encouraged to use the div element instead”.

    WCAG notes specifically speak against sections with mixed content:
    “More specifically, use of the section element is not to be thought of as outlining content that needs to be styled visually in a particular way. If this is the case the author is advised to just use a semantically neutral div. Also, if the elements in the section cannot be described in one or two sentences, then section should not be used; div should be used instead.”

    Finally the inner div simply isn’t necessary to create centered content with a consistent max width anymore. CSS grid and a little imagination can get you there with a single element – display:grid, a minmax() track and justify-content: center. So yes, there is “such a thing a section element in HTML land”…its the section element. You don’t need the div.

    I’m all for making it as easy out-of-the-box for users to get well-formatted content, and tools should try to anticipate the user’s needs, but saying this one way is the correct way is simply not consistent with the specs. Good defaults are a matter of workflow, so maybe saying certain tools are _doing_it_wrong() is a bit heavy-handed.

    • A

      Thanks for your comment. I’ve read the WCAG guidelines many times and I’ve never referred to the section element as “one size fits all.”

      1. I’ve always taught that.
      2. I’ve always taught that.
      3. You don’t, but having an inner container is preferable over using grid. I’ve shown this before.
      4. I’ve taught the other semantic elements and when to use them.
      5. I’ve never said every piece of content on a page should be part of the outline or within a section.
      6. Again, the inner div isn’t necessary, but it’s preferable. That’s why I teach it this way. Grid has more limitations than an inner container.
      7. I’ve NEVER said that this method of sectioning content is the *only* way. Never. The article argues for it being the *preferential* way based on weighing pros and cons. And none of your arguments save any of the listed page builders, so they’re inconsequential to that extent.

  • Jeff Tincher

    Great article, Kevin! Truly explains the reasoning and value of correct HTML and semantics. Also doesn’t having best practices for semantic structure help with SEO? Pretty sure it does play a role.

    BTW, when is the Geary Builder being released?? 😉

  • Another great post, thank you for sharing all this with us. 👨‍💻

  • Kevin, you have upped your game in the documentation and article department – impressive. I am glad you enjoy the sparring which appears to occur with most of your educational posts in Bricks. The community has benefitted significantly from your educational efforts (in spite of, or perhaps because of?, the controversy) – keep those nuggets coming!

  • Well, some developers insist this is wrong without a valid reason!!
    I tried with Breakdance Builder developer (Louis Reingold) but he unfortunately terminated the request with the word “False”. even though he mentioned that Oxygen Builder was made for this and it’s not.


    • A

      That’s unfortunate, because I can give precise reasons for why it should be done this way. Whenever I say, “that’s not correct,” I make it a point to give precise examples for WHY. When people can’t or won’t explain the “why,” we shouldn’t bother listening to them. The unfortunate part is that Breakdance’s users don’t get what they need because leadership disagrees with solid fundamentals.

Leave your comment

Kevin Geary

Kevin is the CEO of Digital Gravy, creator of Automatic.css, creator of Frames, and a passionate WordPress educator. If you're interested in learning directly from Kevin, you can join his 1500+ member Inner Circle.

More articles like this

related posts